Skip to content
VARZINIndependent research
Menu

Independent computational research · VARZIN Project

Finite systems.
Open questions.
Traceable evidence.

A research program at the intersection of finite affine mathematics, reproducible computation, and constructed symbolic systems.

Led by Reza Nirouyar. Built around explicit assumptions, controlled tests, and a record that remains open to correction.

FIG. 01 FINITE AFFINE SYSTEM
Illustration of the permutation x maps to 5x plus 1 modulo 12 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
f(x) = 5x + 1 mod 12A permutation of ℤ₁₂ · illustrative, not experimental data
Research, with its limits visible.Evidence taxonomy ↓Negative results ↓Corrections & provenance ↓

01 / Reading the evidence

Different claims.
Different standards of evidence.

A mathematical proof, a computational report and an empirical question are distinct research records. Each should be read within its stated scope.

Proved mathematics

Affine bijection criterion; valid multiplier count.

Reproducible computation

Deterministic implementations; verify the specific release.

Project-reported

Computational findings with stated artifact limits.

Conditional

Mirror-13 MDL depends on its coding and candidate space.

Exploratory

Designed structure and hypotheses requiring controls.

Negative

Tested criteria or predicted recovery not achieved.

Open questions

Independent semantics remain unestablished.

Planned research

Human evaluation; no established outcome.

Historical / superseded

Earlier claims retained for provenance.

No established evidence for physical or consciousness-field effects, quantum mechanisms, frequency-to-meaning causation, or independent semantic emergence. Read the current research position ↗

02 / Research directions

A focused research program.

View the complete atlas ↗
A / MATHEMATICS

Finite affine systems

Affine permutations over finite cyclic spaces, deterministic models and construction-specific audits.

|Aff(ℤN)| = Nφ(N)

The bijection criterion is proved mathematics. Mirror-13 connectivity checks are a separate computational record.

Read the finite affine systems guide ↗
B / SYMBOLIC STRUCTURE

LUXVAR

A constructed symbolic system with deliberately designed morphemic and structural regularities.

Core-30 / public registry

The broader v2.2 design reports 801 stable roots and an approximately 1.3-billion-form generated corpus. Later work adds distinct 300-word, 360-word, and 10,800-record benchmarks; these are not one silently enlarged canonical lexicon. Surface structure does not establish independent semantics.

Understand LUXVAR ↗ · Scale & benchmark map ↗
C / OPEN EMPIRICAL QUESTIONS

Controlled evaluation

Protocols for separating intended semantic structure from morphology, matched controls and training effects.

Planned / human evaluation

Recruitment has not commenced for the later N=59 plan. No human outcome is established; protocol identities remain unresolved.

Read protocol history & limits ↗
AI structure-auditing guide ↗

03 / Applied research

From research artifact
to security prototype.

Open product record ↗
VARZIN COGNITIVE CAPTCHA

Affine-structure anti-automation demonstrator

A tested local MVP plus a live commercial generation API: Aff(ℤ₁₂)/LUXVAR challenge construction delivered locally through Streamlit and globally through RapidAPI with a Render-hosted FastAPI origin.

10 / 10 verified local challenge flow

The corrected local Streamlit build completed all ten generated challenges without application exceptions. Production bot-resistance remains an open validation question.

See test evidence, limitations & public demo ↗
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

A product page without inflated security claims

Earlier mockup-level production-security claims were not supported by the current evidence base and are not promoted on the research portal.

The delivery path is explicit: verified local MVP + RapidAPI/Render API → origin hardening and independent human-versus-automation evaluation → larger unseen challenge family → stronger production security engineering.

Read the model-evidence boundary ↗

04 / Selected research records

Read the work. Inspect the scope.

All publications & DOI records ↗

Project-listed public deposits. Listing a record does not imply independent validation or peer review; version-specific DOIs are preserved for provenance.

Machine-readable research output list ↗

05 / Reproducibility

Follow the result
back to its source.

Reproducibility belongs to a specific artifact and release. For current scientific interpretation, this portal now prioritizes the latest relevant Zenodo manuscript and its version-matched code/data package; older prose remains provenance rather than authority over later evidence.

  1. 01

    Identify the record

    Use the exact DOI and release in the publication registry.

  2. 02

    Read the specification

    Separate proved statements from reported computation and inspect the evidence boundaries.

  3. 03

    Check the audit trail

    Consult preprint corrections and addenda; retain artifact limitations in any citation.

06 / Negative results

What the tests did not establish.

Negative results constrain the next question. They remain visible alongside positive findings.

Negative · tested frozen models

Semantic-axis recovery

Track D reported ARI −0.0337 for Mistral 7B and +0.0152 for Llama 3 8B against intended axis/orbit labels. This finding applies to those unremediated models and that protocol.

Open the frozen-audit record ↗
Negative · tested composition

Unseen-pair generalization

In v3, seen-pair MLP fit ≈0.996 but held-out TRUE accuracy is 0.106, below SHUFFLED 0.281 and WRONG_OP 0.175. VARZIN V2 separately reports 0/58 composition passes despite mean frozen-Qwen probe BA 0.9666.

Read the current AI evidence map ↗
Criterion not met

Semantic evidence

SEM-001 found no string-level semantic-axis signal in the tested analysis. SEM-002 met 1 of 4 criteria against a threshold of at least 2 of 4.

Read the preprint record ↗

07 / Provenance & corrections

A research record
that can be questioned.

Earlier interpretations remain traceable. Corrections change the reading of the evidence; historical documents do not override the current position.

Inspect the access-action register ↗
  1. 01

    Clustering interpretation corrected

    Historical ARI 0.812 concerns inter-model surface/morpheme agreement, not intended semantic-axis recovery. Raw pairwise scoring was not independently reverified at correction.

  2. 02

    Version identities remain explicit

    The 20691858 / 22115483 deposit-version mapping and YEGJ8 / 2NKZA protocol relationship remain partially unresolved.

  3. 03

    Historical material stays accessible

    Earlier symbolic narratives, historical reports and the previous portal are preserved as provenance, not current findings.

The computational atlas

Find your way through the research.

Mathematical core, Core-30 registry, methods, negative findings and the archive boundary—in one public index.

Enter the research atlas ↗

Researcher / Project author

Reza Nirouyar

Independent Researcher · VARZIN Project

Research in finite affine systems, reproducible computational models and the structured analysis of LUXVAR.

Cite a specific result.

Use the DOI or release associated with the finding. For the portal itself: Nirouyar, Reza. VARZIN Research Portal and Reproducibility Materials. VARZIN Project.

Find citation records ↗

Contact the researcher ↗